At the risk of coming across as someone who disagrees with reviewers
(which is not the case), I decided to write a discussion topic
pertaining to a recent experience I've had. For the record, I discussed
this post with one of the reviewers in details, and shared it with her
before posting it. Like me, she thought it would be a good start for a
discussion.
Literary Fiction in the current genre market
The idea for this
post arrived at the heels of three separate discussions I had with
reviewers who recently reviewed my books. Its purpose is neither to
soothe my ego, nor to disagree with the reviewers' assessments of my
work but, rather, to invite an open discussion.
As you might
have guessed by now, the reviewers referenced here did not receive my
work with open arms. This, however, does not bother me, as I am a firm
believer in honesty, and I embrace any review whether good or bad.
Rather, I look at my recent experience as a learning opportunity. For
all intended purpose, my subsequent discussions with the reviewers were
nothing but pleasant and civil.
Part one: What had I learned?
I've
learned that many reviewers are not familiar with the terms 'literary
fiction' or 'literary novel'. This does not come as a surprise. Despite
reading literary novels for over two decades, I can only name one review
site devoted to the genre - Dactyl Review. A lot of reviewers who have
their own blogs these days are fairly young and have never read authors
like Hamsun, Camus, Handke, Cossery, Kafka... Having said that, the three
reviewers I spoke with had no idea what literary fiction is.
Part two: What is literary fiction?
This
is a loaded question. Instead of supplying some generally accepted
definition I could find on Google, I'll present my own interpretation:
Literary fiction or a literary novel is a written work where the
protagonist's state of mind and resulting actions take precedence over
the plot itself. I realize that this definition may not suit everyone,
and I'm open to a discussion on this.
My second criteria would be that the book is as true to life as possible.
For
me, literary novels are packed with emotions and real human
experiences. The protagonists are not always likeable, the villains are
not always bad, but we experience the world through their eyes and
thoughts, which, in turn, teaches us something about our world. Such is
life.
Part Three: The Critique.
All three reviewers
mentioned that my protagonist was "an unreliable narrator". Upon further
exploration, I had learned that this meant my protagonist did not
contain his narrative to the main plot line only but rambled and spoke
off topic, and that his point-of-view was compromised with internal
monologue.
One other issue mentioned was that some instances and
events in the novel were not very much fiction-like, because there were
random actions too true to life.
Writing in a first-person
narrative is not an easy task. Actually, writing is not an easy task no
matter what narrative the author decides upon. For me, in this
particular story, there are two simultaneous narratives: One of the plot
relayed through the protagonist's sensory receptions, and one of the
protagonist's internal monologue - his mental state. A character driven
to the edge of sanity by his ordeal reflects upon his inner thoughts in
random, while not leaving the plot. My protagonist, by all means, fits
the preceding sentence. He has dreams, nightmares, opinions. He
reflects, he desires, he muses. But he continues to narrate the story
all the while. In my humble attempt to delve into the human psyche, I
selected a scenario and a character that work well together. From the
onset, the protagonist shows signs of paranoia. After his ordeal (the
plot thickens), he has to deal with a lot more than he can handle; thus
he retreats to his safety zone, his mind.
On the subject of
being too true to life, I was told that there were instances when the
reader expected something different to happen. In an example, the
protagonist reaches out to a former boyfriend and ask for help. The
boyfriend ignores the request and the protagonist, not having any other
choice, goes back to his ordeal. A reviewer expected the boyfriend to
make things happen, to come for the protagonist. After all, the reviewer
has read many fictional books where this would be the norm. Shall I
call it a happy Hollywood ending?
In realistic fiction, however,
this does not happen often. Sure there are instances where a happy
ending is warranted. There are instances when magic and miracles truly
happen. Nevertheless, these instances are rare, and life as we know it
is not as easy as a happily-ever-after story. When I was writing this
particular novel, I wanted to explore the limits of human endurance, of
human spirit. After all, the blurb states: "This is a story of
humanity's worst nemesis - itself." With a description like that, there
has to be drama.
For me, it was important to write a realistic
book with realistic characters. It's a slice of life, albeit not
everyone's life and certainly not everyday life. If it comes across as
"too real", then I'm happy.
Conclusion:
Overall, this
entire experience has been very pleasant. When I set out to find out
more about what the reviewers meant, I had no idea that we would engage
on the level we did. I had no idea that a week later we would be sending
emails back and forth, talking about styles, literature, writers, and
yes, even exchanging cooking recipes. I had learned some things I was
unaware of, and the reviewers had learned a bit more about different
literary styles.
I had not asked any of the reviewers to
reconsider their reviews, nor do I plan to do that. Their opinions are
what they are, or were when they reviewed my work, and I respect that.
It was never my intention to challenge or discredit those opinions.
So what is the purpose of this post?
A
discussion. Hopefully this topic resonates with someone who reads this,
be it a reviewer or an author. If you write Literary Fiction, have you
encountered similar issues? If you reviewed literary fiction and did not
know what you were getting into, what was your experience?
If
you decide to engage in a conversation about this, it should remain
civil. There will be no author or reviewer bashing here, no name
calling, and no personal attacks.
Please keep in mind that when
it comes to reviewing, there are no wrong opinions. Tastes and
interpretations vary greatly among readers, and everyone is entitled to
their own opinion.
I would appreciate to learn your take on this. If you have something to
add, if you agree or disagree with something I have said, or if you just
want your opinion to be heard, please comment here.
For all intended purposes, the discussion has moved here: https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/1562629-literary-fiction-in-the-current-genre-market---review-difficulties#comment_id_86417497
No comments:
Post a Comment